InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 126
Posts 11077
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/17/2005

Re: wilma6311 post# 6471

Saturday, 12/27/2014 11:27:24 AM

Saturday, December 27, 2014 11:27:24 AM

Post# of 10055
wilma: Information provided and links asked for below. [b\Please read this entire post.

But first...

Les...I have answered this question numerous times. The fact that it has not resonated in the past leads me to believe I'd be wasting my time saying it again

That's not true. We've only seen two reasons provided as reasons to answer, "WHY NOT KEYO?"...


1) article writers using the term, "IPO" when interpreting for their readers what they think Dr.SS's actual words, "go public" specifically meant
2) an unverifiable ***EMAIL FROM CEO*** from an internet stranger that doesn't specifically state the KEYO shell would not be used for anything


You stated a RM w/ KEYO just not making logical sense as "the most compelling thing" in your favor (reason for 'Why not KEYO?'), BUT, that's what we're trying to say...

We've never heard, read or seen you or anybody explain what is it exactly that does not make logical sense about Dr.SS using KEYO to RM any one of his LLC's public???

That's all we're asking...if you have that one (or more) logical reason(s), please share what you see it is (which we haven't seen to date).


Per your request, listed below are a few of the logical reasons (w/ links) for Dr.SS using KEYO to RTM any one of his LLC's pubic:

1) It is exceedingly difficult to do an initial public offering of an LLC, making "going public" via a RTM a much cleaner and simpler process than via an IPO
2) Dr.SS owns 80% of a clean public shell (KEYO) he can use to avoid the excessive difficulties described in the link as well as avoiding massive amounts of corporate taxes using KEYO to RTM w/ NANT
3) Dr.SS can avoid the pitfalls associated w/ IPO's such as most probably losing his 80% control in his companies (his historical M.O.) as well as the underwriters pulling his IPO at the last second due to unfavorable market conditions, such as Box.com recently did
4) The main reason for a company to go public via an IPO is because "it's simply a money making move". Therefore, it is illogical for Dr.SS to look to an IPO to "make money" or better put, raise capital for the company because he financed the creation of the company himself and has had ~2/3's of that given (raised) to him through private equity placements


In the end though, it all goes down to his ownership of KEYO - the stock/shell/capital structure of a public company.

WHY does he still own it? WHY did he not sell it? WHY has he not de-listed it? WHY has the SEC not suspended trading even after the SEC's three-year "Operation Shell Expel" should have uncovered this supposed "pump-and-dump" scam.


The $21+MM Dr.SS paid for 80% control of KEYO equates to 30+MM shares of KEYO that will be worth many more billions over time than he can make off a single day fund-raising effort and IPO would afford him.

There is no comparison.

Can you imagine the value of 30MM shares of NantWorks in ten years time?

Staggering.

lns

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.