InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 901
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/31/2013

Re: maris9 post# 28240

Wednesday, 12/17/2014 12:21:41 PM

Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:21:41 PM

Post# of 48316
Meris, I don't think you understand the difference between these two types of treatments. Have you ever heard the saying, "feed a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, but teach them to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime." A laser will take care of a tumor in a day and if cancer springs up again you must treat it again. But with immuno pulse you teach the immune system to eat tumors potentially for a lifetime. I'm not quite sure of it's durability over the lifespan. Cancer is an auto immune disease and so to me it makes sense to treat the immune system at its core processing level.

A laser cannot increase the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes needed to combat cancer cells, and neither can it produce a systemic response to other cancer tumors in the body, and neither cannot remove the brakes off of Petey one inhibitors so that they can do their job more effectively across the board. In that sense a laser is like a hammer and it only had one nail at a time – – Immuno pulse is like and IT engineer that literally comes in and helps reprogram the entire system to operate more efficiently while fight internal bugs, malware, hacksby increasing the internal security system-- the immune system. Everything has its place in life, I just think Immuno pulse is the far more advanced and sophisticated means of helping our bodies get and stay healthy when fighting cancer.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ONCSQ News