InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/17/2009

Re: shabby47 post# 9043

Thursday, 12/11/2014 4:53:17 PM

Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:53:17 PM

Post# of 16759
"A logical person would also put some weight in the technology rather than mere equations that anybody can plug numbers into to get the results they want."

1+1 equals 2. No matter how badly anyone wants it to equal 3, it will always equal 2. Technologies (products) do not operate businesses; people do. At the end of the day, it takes a human being to pick up the phone and sell the product. Coca-Cola is sugar water. Many people sold their version of sugar water. Coca-Cola had a better management team which is why their sugar water outsells everyone else's sugar water. Focusing solely on the product and not paying attention to it's handlers is not the wisest way to invest.

"I don't think that anybody here has ever suggested that the company should be making $1m a month at this point so the idea that somehow they are failing due to that is absurd."

Recently, an analyst projected that Nanologix would earn $900,000 in revenue from one of its contracts. I believe that was a suggestion that it should be earning close to $1 million per year at this point.

"Do you have an opinion on the n-assay for example? I do not think I have ever seen you comment on it and that could be a major part of the company's sales model soon."

I'm not a scientist. It would take a scientist to give an expert opinion. I don't consider someone who gets paid by the company a proper perspective.