The purpose was to let somebody more trustworthy than Shelly run and control the company, for whatever it ends up being worth to anyone. As you know, I agreed to sell my Preferred shares in 2011 in order to take PivX Solutions private.
I have no desire to run a probiotics company. Agreeing to help launch Adia as part of going private while I rebuilt PivX was not supposed to have facilitated any acts of fraud, and in any scenario going forward there will be no acts of fraud by anyone in connection with ADIA as long as I am still alive. If the only way to guarantee that no fraud is perpetrated is to remove Bill Hodson and litigate to enforce contracts then that's where we're going next with this long-term turnaround effort.
Your concept of "unqualified to be CEO" is absurd, and you know it. Have you encountered the legal principle of "defamation per se" before? If not, you will in the future if you continue your pattern of harassment against people who find it less entertaining than I do.
It's easy to criticize and label as "mismanagement" the slow, small-scale non-public product engineering and business development of a startup. The things that create actual value and growth potential for Homeland Forensics have nothing to do with Shelly and Bill nor with any ridiculous or wrong-headed wasteful spending and mismanagement -- my sole concern here is to make certain that if I permit Bill to continue forward on his current trajectory that no fraud will ever occur as a result. If I cannot be certain of that then my sole concern is to make sure that the shareholders are not deprived of the future value of Homeland Forensics in the process of the final dissolution of Adia Nutrition, Inc.
