More information? USPR has info now from non SEC compliant methods, so who cares? Plus, in the 43-101 that USPR chose not to file, USPR's expert geologists made these recommendations for work to be done prior to additional drilling to gather the correct info...
"• More work on the geological interpretation is needed as a first step before additional drilling commences.
- The lithology needs to be compiled into a digital lithology table and plotted alongside the assays to confirm the rock type with the assays.
- Geological interpretation is needed for the 2008 and 2010 drilling to identify veins in the assay and lithology tables.
- Cross-sections and other graphics are needed to aid the geological interpretation and construction of 3D vein solids.
- More detail is needed about the surface vein outcrops - such as strike & dip along the vein. The quartz vein outcrops need to be mapped and digitized to assist in correlating with veins in drill holes.
- Trench samples from the Harper report should be added to the database.
- A graphical solid model needs to be built using the surface vein info (strike, dip, etc) and the drill hole data. A model is needed for each vein."
USPR do any of what their expert geologists told them to do??
This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.