Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:31:46 AM
There has been no motions entered in OUR Spherix v Cisco case since the first week in Sept., 2014 yet there is no stay. Spherix claims that Bockstar v Cisco and Spherix V Cisco are two separate cases and yet Cisco, in their counterclaims, requested to have Spherix's and it's patents joined in the Bockstar V Cisco litigation and as far as I can tell we are currently joined in that case. If we are not joined in that litigation then why is a lawyer representing Spherix represented in that case? If we are joined in the Bockstar V Cisco why are we not part of that term sheet settlement? Why hasn't Spherix clarified their involvement in the Bockstar/ Cisco litigation, or even mentioned it? How can the court join Spherix in the Bockstar litigation, and not stay the Spherix V Cisco?
---------------------
If anyone would like to ask these questions of Spherix be my guest. Just use the above. More than likely they will answer your questions via telephone and skirt them.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM