InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 2833
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2012

Re: brharris post# 110045

Wednesday, 11/26/2014 10:15:37 AM

Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:15:37 AM

Post# of 130513
You guys did not even get a sen and spec. seriously, there is nothing scientific about this report. You may remember the PD report in Jan 2013 which was supposed to reveal key data about MANF, there were four or six rats in that study.

Absolutely no organization reports their data in this manner. And frankly, everyone knows that.

In academia it is just not done.

Frankly, I do not care if they do good science or not, I know what is good science. If folks buy on the basis of bad science then you know to get off the wagon at the peak.

It happened with Lympro, MANF for PD, and it will happen again. The MANF for PD in Jan run up failed when it was revealed that four or six rats were involved in the study.

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
Winston Churchill