NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[drkazmd65]

What in your opinion would be the top 3 legitimate criticisms about NNVC?

I don't know if I have a clear 'top 3' - but there have been regular points in years leading up to the present year - where management has (indeed) been far too optimistic about deadlines.

This past year - my biggest legitimate criticism about NNVC's management has been lack of clear communication on two very general points:

1) What - at least in general terms (approximate days/weeks) - time period does it take to make a QC acceptable batch of any particular 'Cide from start to finish?

A working timeline for making a '200 g' (or any other particular quantity synthesis size) - stated publically - would not seem to be particularly revealing of IP or 'trade secret' information AND would have eliminated a lot of the most recent sets of months criticsm of the company. I know enough to make some educated guesses as to how much time is likely to take to do this, but that's an educated guess with no hard data.

2)When is the Shelton plant expected to come online?

Again - I don't think that a hard timeline (or at least a squishy & hedged one) for when they expect the plant to go online - dependent on any missing equipment pieces of equipment are brought into the facility and online would be too revealing of IP or 'trade secrets' - and would have headed off much potential criticism of the company over the last year or so since the facility construction & refurbishment was iniated.


Beyond these couple of points - each of which would seem to be relatively easy to communicate - most of the rest of what goes on behind closed doors for the company has either been relatively forthcoming (IMO) or could be construed as revealing soemthing "IP" related that shouldn't (yet) be revealed.

Everything else that has been leveled as a criticsm of NNVC or it's principles is trumped up or trivial.