InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,702.55
(
-0.19%
)
US TECH 100
19,287.60
(
-0.24%
)
Dow Jones
42,063.36
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
74.22
(
0.45%
)
Bitcoin
63,857.48
(
0.37%
)
Post# of 18904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

russo123

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 3591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2010

russo123

Re: gitreal post# 12720

Tuesday, 11/25/2014 3:40:22 PM

Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:40:22 PM

Post# of 18904
Well they finally got me to look at the 43-101. But again, I'm not mining literate but am a huge fan of logic.

They keep leaving off what comes after the "promising" part. USPR's expert geologists go on to say after that...

"19.1 Potential Risks
Because of the apparently fragmentary nature of the veins, a risk exists that insufficient information can be collected to demonstrate continuity of the veins below the surface over large enough distances for an economic reserve."

The focus should be on insufficient information to demonstrate an economic reserve, not on promising.

This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up