Here is a simpler way to look at what has transpired and this applies to a majority of penny and speculative equities and somewhat to the broader market. In my opinion...
When a company has a story to tell it is almost always surrounded by those who want to finance and profit and insiders who want rewarded for progress.
In the case of SVFC, there is plenty of indications and inferences that tell us there is a story to tell.
But for the last year the stock had drifted lower from .01 down to today's prices. If you had to guess most of the trading positions prior to October were likely averaged in around say .003-.005 range. Now it becomes difficult to raise funds, have new money or partners enter, reward insiders, promoters, handlers if their entry prices sit near the average level of longer term frustrated positions. Profit opportunity is minimal. So the stock crashes and now there are all kinds of positions, averaged sub .001. When this gets back to .003-.005 there is plenty of profit and room for these new positions. Not so much for old money.
Your choice should be simple. Either you believe there is a story brewing here and you adjust your expectations and possibly your position accordingly. Or you don't believe and cut your losses.
I have no use for those who have handled this entity thus far. Greed and selfishness amazes me at times. Yet, in spite of that, I still have chosen to average down considerably. I may be wrong but it is the risk I make understanding logic behind what has transpired. Both the fair and hopeful logic and the logic that pisses me off.
I believe my logic will begin to play out soon and over the course of the next 3/6 months... But I could be wrong. GLTA
