InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,718.57
(
0.28%
)
US TECH 100
19,321.60
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
42,124.65
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
74.36
(
0.84%
)
Bitcoin
63,519.38
(
0.30%
)
Post# of 68833
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Daytime_Lantern

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 1733
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2014

Daytime_Lantern

Re: Krysti post# 45417

Friday, 11/21/2014 9:02:17 PM

Friday, November 21, 2014 9:02:17 PM

Post# of 68833
Sir, your argument is confusing. The suit against PA Inc. was based on the same patent infringement articles filed against the other companies, (i.e., AlarmForce, CPI Security Systems, etc.). So, if the judge dismissed the suit against PA, because the patents are inherently weak, then why he didn't do the same regarding the other companies?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up