InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 20260
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/14/2003

Re: None

Friday, 11/21/2014 8:37:25 PM

Friday, November 21, 2014 8:37:25 PM

Post# of 432570
Squinge the CAFC found that the products or pNokio defenses met certain claim limitations of the patents sent back on remand. Maybe those are the partial summary determinations IDCC is seeking.

It seems to that if pNokio did not infringe then they shim oils have won on their summary motions which the ITC denied the other day. So if pNokio lost then do they infringe on the claim constructions if the CAFC and their limitation decisions.

Things that make you go hmm.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News