"first there are only 1.4 mill aboriginals and change in canada."
This number represents a potential consumer base even if it is a fraction just to begin with. This fixation upon a static number is pointless.
"second the set aside only applies to the aboriginals if they want to be a licensed producer and sell to the masses of canadians , they need to send in a application to the HC."
Again, misinformed. The set aside is to give the tribe the necessary license to grow with $SLNX to produce and market to the First Nations and to Canadians in general.
"ive seen the list of applicants i dont see where their application is pending in que or approved."
I'm sure you have.
"again no rev off aboriginals they only make up 4.3% of the canadian population ."
Please explain your definition of "revenue" and why 4.3% of a population base with a 10% capture rate is bad thing considering there zero insight with the product line? As always, math requires visible display of work.
"terrible business sense."
Conjecture.
"they should have applied to be a licensed producer not this set aside"
This was clearly explained multiple times by $SLNX. One more time: The set aside is pursued by us with First Nations because they are economically disadvantaged and thus have a very high priority due to current law.
"low revs if any from this small consumer base essentially all have to be sick lmao......."
Again, MMJ has been clearly explained over and over. Being sick is a very, very, small part of this. It's the homeopathic part of it to relieve aches and pain. Infused topicals, salves, and oils are the bulk of this.
