InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 6229
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/11/2006

Re: loanranger post# 275313

Friday, 11/21/2014 11:15:10 AM

Friday, November 21, 2014 11:15:10 AM

Post# of 312025

The sentence immediately preceding the one that included the phrase in the 10-K that said "also specifies contingent fees of 5% of the gross transaction amount for introducing a merger or acquisition candidate" was:
"Additionally, under the terms of the consulting agreement the Company is committed to issue 1,000,000 additional shares if the Company becomes listed on the AMEX division of the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ."
Do you expect that the sale of the company will preclude any need to become listed on the AMEX division of the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ? Or will such a listing render consideration of a sale unnecessary?


LOL, I agree with your subtle point neither will likely happen. I don't think the engineering company is one of the parties unless they are Bespoke, Greentree, or Brewer Group. Now I supposed they could be that unnamed arm's length party. But that party seems to be left out of the gravy train if you tend to believe the 10K is accurate on those points. We know the 10K is a disaster but I am assuming for the sake of this discussion they got at least that part of it somewhat correct.

Now to your point on obstacles to a sale I do agree. I was giving the perspective of what I think Heddle's strategy may be here and why he priced the options the way he did. I think the fact their patents are in huge trouble giving them essentially zero IP is devastating to any potential sale of either processors or the company. The fact the machines are broken and even when they are "working" barely run a tiny percentage of their capacity also does not paint a very good picture to a buyer. And as you mention they have large liabilities even before the debt to Heddle.

I am sure on Heddle's strategy roadmap there are several steps that simply say "Insert miracle here".