An amicable $2bn settlement with Protect America? Hardly.
I agree that Protect America would find it extremely difficult to arrange $2bn to buy a patent that has zero earnings history.
Add to that the fact that there are 3 suits in which the validity of the patent is being tested, and you have a further reason why the idea of raising $2bn to buy it might not be taken seriously.
And, if the patent was worth anything remotely close to that figure it is more likely that the bankers would prefer an approach from, say, Microsoft, over one from Protect America.
All and any connections between REVO and Microsoft (or any $50bn corporations) are figments of desperate imaginations.
But, false hope springs eternal on this stock.