How can you be defending someone for NOT communicating AND NOT creating results worth communicating POSITIVELY about for these many many moons?
Seems oxymoronic imo. Just means he is lousy through and through.
As for Indy, since he is under NDA and cannot communicate about what he's privy to, or been doing for the Argus, how can one come too the conclusion that he has not contributed to its future success?
I figure all may come to light when the light switch gets flipped. Only then can we see who we should give kudos to and who we should spit on. True?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.