Intellect issued a pr which is not against the Court order Doc.#44 pages 24,25,26 decision/order on the motion.One might read the order then make a educated quess of the meaning.
The court order granted to the defense (STATED) no dollar amounts,financial numbers were to be uploaded on e-file or submitted to the court for the public at large to see,read or print.
The court order had nothing to do with pr's,SEC filings by either party and justice Oing even makes comments regarding 10k ect.Once the breach occured by Pfizer ILNS could legally imo pr anything they wanted regarding the ligation,names dollar amounts of all parties and it would in no way violate the court order (wording) Justice Oing issued regarding the decision/order on the motion.
The counter claim by the Pfizer shall be denied just as I stated the motion to dismiss was denied imho LOL.
Futhermore Defense Exhibit 7,8, Intellect's pr's never stated who owed ILNS the money.Pr's 7/11/12,10/15/12 which the defense uploaded these exhibits 2/7/14 almost 10 months after Oing signed the order to seal/redact dollar amounts financial numbers in direct violation of said order.
As far as the copyright I missed one thing the defense did not uploaded the Intellect Neuroscience Logo but I still question the photo ect cause to me that is still apart of Intellect's trademark.
One thing for certain (YOU) don't see Defense Doc.#109 proposed order signed do you.Today is November 19,2014 and it was filed 10/07/14.
IMO you want ever see that cause either Oing has to amend his prior order or issue a new order that supercedes his prior order and that's not going to happen.
Oing would be saying to all my orders are worthless and you can do as you please regarding filings submittted to the court or e-filed.
AI
