Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[nobody12378]

A clue?

In https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_ch8gAs4lCcUk9VaHZrZ2lLbUg5emRGSjhJQkJaNktuUmFZ/view

the judge writes, "In Section VI.B, the Court ruled in favor of the Defendants on their defense that the '858 patent family was invalid pursuant to the on-sale bar found in 35 U.S.C. 102(b) ...".

This language gives the appearance that the sole reason for ordering the SJ was violation of the on-sale bar.