Clearly a statement from the other end of the HORSE. Any and all PR's must (BY LAW) include that. You would have us believe that all PR's are FALSE. How twisted is that? Do you inform us that your statements are "BACKWARD LOOKING" and may or may not be true? I guess the lawsuit fillings were a REVO PR pump fabrication?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.