InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 50
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/08/2013

Re: Mattski post# 5736

Friday, 10/31/2014 8:36:55 AM

Friday, October 31, 2014 8:36:55 AM

Post# of 20153
Mattski, I don't have an issue with you personally, I don't even know you but I can tell from your last post you sound like a reasonable bloke who's just very frustrated, like the rest of us.

I don't have an issue with any non shareholder who wants to smash the company, but what I don't understand is how a shareholder can make comments that at the very least serve no purpose and at worst devalue the shares. That's my beef, plain and simple.

By the sounds of it we've been involved about the same time, I've been tied up in this for 13 years now, so I'm fully aware of your pain. I just don't see any point in causing further harm to the company that I'm invested in, after all, its not like we are ever going to get a response via this media anyway.

If I were you I would attempt to make contact with someone other than who you have been previously liaising with, who knows, you may get the answers you are looking for.

After all, Janet Yellen from the Fed Reserve has never once talked down about the US economy, no matter how bad it got.

You are correct with regard to your final question though, nothing positive (concrete) in the last 10 years...that we know of. However, I will say that in the last 6 months a number of things have aligned to position the company with the best shot its ever had, including an advisor being appointed to the Board, who by all accounts brings significant credibility to the table, and an investment bank which is currently raising capital. I'm confident that if we can secure the capital, it will very quickly become a different story for SMME.

Anyway, no hard feelings and to prove it I'll even shout you the first beer at the victory party.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SMME News