InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 259
Posts 3732
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2013

Re: On2_addict post# 177057

Thursday, 10/30/2014 2:24:17 PM

Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:24:17 PM

Post# of 238025
I think that MJNA has given the SEC plenty to ponder, but I would hope that they don't get suspended. I would prefer to see the company deliver on its promises to become more transparent.

Last year, they acknowledged that the SEC had an inquiry, so we know that they are on its radar. Michelle Sides posted an outrageous, over-the-top revenue guidance i February of 2013. If that didn't trigger suspension, it's pretty hard to say what will. Linking to an article with a clearly incorrect material statement ($60mm sales) in a press release and then tweeting about "BrokerBank Securities" which issued a press release with that exact same incorrect information won't help their cause if the SEC is looking at them still. Their habitual tardiness with quarterly disclosures is probably not an issue, but the SEC does suspend companies even when they aren't SEC filers for not making information available.

If you don't like my posts, don't read them. If you think only those who agree with you should post, then start your own message board. My conclusions are my opinion only, based on what I believe to be true. I have no crystal ball.