InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 3085
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2011

Re: Snizzle post# 28512

Wednesday, 10/29/2014 6:49:55 PM

Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:49:55 PM

Post# of 28870
I'm not going to comment on any of the stuff that was posted. It all speaks for itself and for it's author(s).

I will say this: Pretty easy to see who took the high road, and who sunk to levels that were pretty much unimaginable.

On the Coral Springs PD- It's simple enough to just quote this: (bold emphasis was added by me).

http://renuentruth.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/observations/

Coral Springs Police Department: The Coral Springs Police Department Facebook page posted a consumer warning telling everyone to be aware of RenuEn/Energy Solutions and their supposed fraudulent sales and installations practices. At first, I thought this was as definite game changer. Instead of anonymous internet blogs, posts and tweets, there was finally a legitimate, substantiated claim against the company. The blogs and tweets picked up this ball and ran for the goal line with it, as rightly they should have. Game over, right?

Well, just as quickly as it was put it, it was taken down, no explanation given. (For you internet hounds, Google has a cached page, if you know how to search it.) How does this happen? Why did this happen? How does a government entity, designed to protect and serve, publicly post a warning to it’s citizens, and then simply remove it with no explanation? Was it false? Was it posted in error? If so, shouldn’t have someone been held accountable? Upon what information was it originally posted? Who did the investigative journalism here to verify it’s accuracy prior to it being made known on a public site, run by a government entity? Who’s doing the investigative journalism here to find out what really happened?



In the same vein: WPTV, Strathman and the producer are all at fault as well. I'm sure that they were given the same information about what was going on (Sheesh, they even had a shot of the court document during the segment!), and chose to ignore it, in order to portray the story how they wanted to. Now, come to find out that Lerman had a "contact" in the news and "might get a story out of it".........

Nuff said. It all speaks for itself.