InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,181.85
(
0.02%
)
US TECH 100
17,604.40
(
-0.03%
)
Dow Jones
38,858.98
(
0.02%
)
Brent Oil
83.08
(
-0.48%
)
Bitcoin
62,981.94
(
-0.29%
)
Post# of 101798
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

blue dog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 1419
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2008

blue dog

Re: risk on post# 90667

Wednesday, 10/29/2014 6:32:37 AM

Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:32:37 AM

Post# of 101798
What I am getting at is that either (a) they have a sizeable amount of recovered materials (i.e., gold, diamonds) on hand, or (b) they knew that their PRs were false when they issued the PRs.

You say there is only option (b) because there is no pot of gold under option (a). I am not a negative as you: (a) seems possible to me. But I want to know what not-(a) would mean, and I can only think of (b) as the not-(a) alternative.

Does anyone think that there is another alternative (c)?


I am an amateur at this, and it would be unwise to rely on my opinions without your own independent confirmation in consultation with an investment professional.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up