You didn't. I didn't know what to make of the Custer comment, but was provoked to use it as a jump off point, as the comment almost sounded as if to question the level of seriousness of my "will make history" comment & then, as usual, it turned into a rant. In trying to figure out what made you think "offended", I had to backtrack thru the comments, to try to figure it out. It just hit me... lol...what you actually meant. I didn't get it the 1st time, hence my post. Now I think I see what you meant was the allegory of "make history"...with what happened to Custer (it didn't go good, right?). So I think then that you were more likely offering your opinion on if you are one of the faithful, (no matter what) or, see it as not too promising (which is how all the developments have come to make me lean). If so, sorry I mistook your comment. Given all the various very questionable elements, it's hard not to be disparaged. I try to keep looking at what seems to be a good & valuable set of patents & all the good parts of the BOD & the hookups w/big, important patent attorneys, and this past year's somewhat austere set of PR's, but ea & every one of these seemingly good points, has not seemed to follow thru w/the results one might expect & instead, almost like some bad deja vu, is turning more into a kind-of strained, stretched, wishful thinking game, which in turn, almost looks to have been fed & kept alive (the belief & faithfulness) by what has at this point become more hype-like, perfectly timed news releases (and the undying love & hope for untold riches, (that an impeccable BOD is working to bring), by the faithful stockholders here). But some of them were so strange (like the PR about an Aussie PR) and some of the crazy wording & uncorrected mistakes (like the whole misnamed white paper section that I posted about - "The Essential Tenants of a voice service [pretty sure that should be "tenets", but they go on to use the same "tenants" about 3 more times in that section, listing them....but no one seems to care...), and the numerous ambiguous statements made by BOD, which have all been covered here, that in retrospect, seem to be "on purpose", to confuse & hide behind...
And all the secrecy about any details.. as if we are to believe that every important aspect & detail is somehow protected by "NDA's", jeez, to the point where I feel like we need to use freedom of information act requests. Where's the infringement letters? Where's the responses? I know, I know..."it takes time!" ....days, weeks, months, years, decades (??)
Please post your opinion(s) on my call for a small infringement case to be immediately initiated.
