FULLER, I would need to know more about your assessment that the TLD was a most crooked and manipulaTive tool used against shareholders to understand what you're getting at.
I would certainly agree that the incredible 'sloppiness' and possibly misleading way this TLD matter has been unfolding , in retrospect, has been strange and disappointing to say the least.
Sloppy because so many seemingly 'off-the cuff' comments by management and Board members, misleading us that NEJM was supposedly to be the vehicle of choice and fabulous news awaited us that would excite the financial world, etc.
Inherint in all this wait and conjecture, imo, was the prevailing sentiments that the information would be so positively dramatic, that it would positively effect share price and be all over the media and enjoy tons of peer accolades.
Well interestingly some of that happened, but nowhere near to the degree that was anticipated and for many it was perplexing and a real discouragement.
WHY?
As one tries to sort out the 'whys', I am of the feeling that one of the main and crucial factors remains an unknown at this time, i.e. this possible desire/plan to heavily control the stock price at this approximate 7.00 level (among other factors like Lanza's selling, etc.) and makes one wonder if all this is apart of a plan to keep the price at a buying level for an interested party(ies), or if just more of the same mm/naked shorters taking their profits in their lucrative otcbb financial playground?
To the best of our knowledge, pending possible new news, we have benefited squat form TLD, unless one wishes to argue this has kept us from filling the lower gap on the fallacious thinking that all the AS will become dilutive OS and all gaps are always filled?
