InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 461
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2011

Re: None

Friday, 10/24/2014 5:42:18 PM

Friday, October 24, 2014 5:42:18 PM

Post# of 42724
Something’s amiss with the image space…

Aside from our satisfying visuals for government agencies’ prime contractors and their end-users is a much more involved circumstance, and certainly a more complicated matter: the advancement, fine tuning, if you will, of our image chamber development.

I have no idea what the hang up is but maybe the materials are rare as in rare earth and the Chinese have the market wrapped-up and are advantaged and curious as to why the need for future inventories, or is it that the image space just needs tweaking? The certainty is that we have the glass and the maker’s competence, but what about the dope and its composition within the glass? Regardless, it seems that no one wants to step forward to help with image chamber progress – for whatever the reason!

Is our problem “beyond risk tolerance of industry” that Doug was talking about last June?

We don’t have what it takes, so says DARPA’s Tactical Technology Office. In other words, “That image chamber isn’t mature enough for our interest, go see our DSO.” The Army referred us to its research laboratory, the ARL, and its training and doctrine command, TRADOC.

It seems to me that our best bet at funding is with DARPA’s Defense Sciences Office in reviewing Wednesday’s updated list of government funding sponsors. Take a look, see what you think.

http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2014/06/16.aspx

The demand is that we get the image chamber perfected… and it appears that until we are federally funded it’s not going to happen, regardless of our capability to do it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CRTG News