Friday, October 24, 2014 12:01:59 PM
The brief zeros in on the question that is the most “obvious” (pardon the expression). Why the hell go through the trouble and expense of a jury trial and all that is involved there---often a couple years of constant discovery and preparation---if someone on appeal can simply take a gander at the record and substitute his/her own de nova feelings? It’s a charade.
This violates the entire structure of our judicial system as presently constituted. It was also noteworthy that the BPLA pointed out the inherent arrogance and condescension in the majority’s indication that juries are too stupid to comprehend patent law cases----even though juries and trial court judges often face up to much more complicated issues in other cases.
Basically, the BPLA --- experts in patent law --- told the justices to jump down off their high horses and join the real world.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM