InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 3591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2010

Re: gnolfinvestor post# 11516

Wednesday, 10/22/2014 7:54:49 PM

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:54:49 PM

Post# of 18904
I know what I know. The 2 geologists that USPR hired to do the 43-101 stated in the third paragraph of their supplement to the 43-101...

"It is most important note as part of full disclosure about the property to emphatically state that the
quantities and grades are conceptual in nature only and do not constitute any level of resource estimate.
As stated in the report, the available information from the USPR drilling programs and the surface
sampling performed by Gerald Harper are insufficient at this time to define a mineral resource"

TO EMPHATICALLY STATE THE QUANTITIES AND GRADE ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE ONLY. Emphatically state. You know, the 2 geologists USPR hired to do the 43-101 emphatically stated that.

THE USPR DRILLING PROGRAMS AND THE SURFACE SAMPLING PERFORMED BY GERALD HARPER ARE INSUFFICIENT AT THIS TIME TO DEFINE A MINERAL RESOURCE

That doesn't sound to me like anyone at USPR knows there's tens of billions there.

This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.