Wednesday, October 22, 2014 5:23:53 PM
The reason why it's not "soooo wrong on so many levels" is because I'm not denying the fact that... "auditors lend credibility" within the market.
However, it is "soooo wrong on so many levels" to insinuate that just because GRCU doesn't have auditors or audited financials, the company must not be real or should not be considered credible. That is where our thoughts differ. The company has achieved much and is worth of being considered credible.
v/r
Sterling
Sterling's Trading & Investing Strategies:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39092516
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM