Tuesday, October 21, 2014 11:03:30 AM
In the past, shareholders who have voted against management or proposals like the equity sharing have never mustered up more than ten to 15 per cent of the votes. Consequently, the ultimate outcome was that management always got their way.
I am thinking that this time, the additional votes may have come from the new financiers of LQMT who were given more stringent terms than earlier deals.
I am thinking that it is the new financiers that voted against the dilution to protect their own interests and to keep the price from tumbling to the bottom.
I could be way off in my thinking, but, they are the only real hard core investors who are concerned about keeping the share price up that have enough collective muscle to do something to effect the outcome of the proxy. Don't think it was Visser at all.
Recent LQMT News
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/21/2023 10:15:45 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/21/2023 10:26:27 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/10/2023 08:37:18 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 08:41:42 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM