InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 142
Posts 5891
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2003

Re: Veblen post# 66722

Tuesday, 10/21/2014 1:05:57 AM

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 1:05:57 AM

Post# of 80983

Two very long posts for such "an inconsequential market phenomenon."

The market phenomenon IS inconsequential. However, apparently shareholders' misinterpretation of that phenomenon requires more than a few sentences to educate them on the concept. And to that end, I will concede it has been a waste of keystrokes on my part.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=96486078

I think your problem is with me not the contents of my posts.

Nope. Don't take criticism of an opinion as a criticism of a person. However, I do note that you never point out the phenomenon when it closes to the downside on a micro-trade.

Saying I am making a "Stink" for posting my thoughts on my observations seems rather rude.

I'm sorry you took it as being rude, as it was merely an observation of behavior based on the content of your posts. And to that end, go back and read your posts...repetition, bold text and exclamation points indicate emotion (i.e. "a stink"), not observation...IMHO.

And for your info, many times the last inconsequential trade is ABOVE the QUOTED CLOSING ASK PRICE

If that is the case, then that would be wrong; however, it doesn't happen that often and many times those are created by after-hours T trades. I know because I check it out just about every time someone complains about it. And as I've maintained for years, it doesn't mean a thing. Next time this happens, point it out to me. And a week from that moment I will point out how that transaction, whatever it meant, had zero effect on the long term share price.