Monday, October 20, 2014 4:13:42 PM
Why would Marani pay all that money to get on screens in Times Square, with no intention of fulfilling the demand potentially generated by those commercials?
Think about it like this. Say this was a scam: Why would they spend money from the scam on something they will get zero return on?
Did Bernie Madoff donate all of his scam money to the Red Cross or Unicef, or did he just keep it in his pocket?
People keep screaming scam, I don't see it. If it were a scam, why the frivolous spending on things that most likely won't produce more investors? Do investors really walk by those screens and say, "man, there's something I should invest in," or do they walk by and say, "where can I buy that vodka?"
Do we think Dunkin Donuts is gaining investors from their perma-screen in Times Square?
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM