InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,048.42
(
-0.46%
)
US TECH 100
17,168.35
(
0.63%
)
Dow Jones
38,085.80
(
-0.98%
)
Brent Oil
88.11
(
-0.05%
)
Bitcoin
64,429.40
(
-0.09%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

swingingRichard

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 11694
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2014

swingingRichard

Re: Alpha Investor post# 7190

Monday, 10/20/2014 12:33:46 PM

Monday, October 20, 2014 12:33:46 PM

Post# of 17377
Ah. Then the idea makes even less sense than before. Are you familiar with US power distribution? If not let me know and I can explain it. I am really glad you pointed that out as it demonstrates how flawed the SWET concept is concerning SWET garnering DoD contracts for bases.

Are remote bases going to get their own tower? No not ever mentioned in business plan. A single swet tower produces far more energy than what a single remote base would consume so building it in these conditions would simply never happen.



My previous post was rhetorical in nature.

Spirits of the night and bats that fly by the light of the moon, come forth from the Astral Realm and jinx the person for all time.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up