InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 4507
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2012

Re: truetrue post# 60755

Monday, 10/20/2014 10:05:35 AM

Monday, October 20, 2014 10:05:35 AM

Post# of 232599
"QUESTION: At that profit to revenue rate, How many years will it take to break even? Generously, let's say 8 to 10 new contracts per year, we're looking at ~ 2 years from next summer. Liquidmetal MUST have the ability to ramp up to that level of business in-house and w/contract mfgs. signed up - still pending."

Those are somewhat lofty goals, but doable for the right person. I will just throw past performance out
The window and say. Perhaps Hauck can accomplish that.

"Revenues from SWATCH and the small amount$ that APPLE pays Liquidmetal for services rendered etc. are not going to get LQMT on any Long Term investor's radar. "

Yep. Now that the Apple products are out, no reason to even think about getting in right now. Especially knowing that the new dilution will possibly erode the SP. And you never know when Visser is liable to dump a mill on the market.

One person who visited the ASM did feel they could announce a contract this year. Don't know why he came to that possibility though. That might excite some.

Readjust portfolios to include LQMT? Man this should be your lotto money. LQMT is far far from investment grade. This is gambling in pinky land bru. Just because sentiment leans a little more bullish these days does not mean that LQMT is anything more than a super high risk stinky penny stock. No reason to go over the history to show why. Again.

Just my opinion and best of luck.

Let's keep it civil and understand that this is a forum of mostly amateur opinions. I am not here to give advice or argue. The best way to get rid of trolls is by using the ignore feature. And if you don't like what I say feel free to ignore me. Thanx.