InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 82
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/01/2013

Re: BlueSkyPop post# 7157

Tuesday, 10/14/2014 12:28:08 PM

Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:28:08 PM

Post# of 15432
I sincerely appreciate all info posted on this board and even different opinions. There is no one that I play "devil's advocate" with more than myself. I am always looking to understand situations from multiple angles.

It was a good find, and we definitely need to keep up with any company that has a hold of our money.

I just think that if Synergy accepted the shares as payment that they see value in DDCC...and looking at the number of shares quite a bit of it.

If there was a judgement in Synergy's favor they could have demanded all cash.

I think the end reasoning is one of two choices...I am going with the first.


1. Synergy sees future profit in DDCC, recognizes it as a real and progressing company, and has willingly chosen to be invested in said company, although not via the usual methods of investing.

OR

2. Synergy's decision makers are unintelligent and gullible. Not only has DDCC allegedly infringed on "their" patent, but now they have decided to accept some ocean front property in Arizona..so to speak...as payment.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.