Sunday, October 05, 2014 2:28:37 PM
For what?
Except, it's a client list for KMA Hong Kong LTD, which is now a private Chinese company.
Neither should it have been any trouble to read the OTC
2012 Annual
Page 6, it clearly states 21-Feb-2011, the subsidiary KMA Hong Kong Ltd was spun off as a separate company. This occurred after rpac bought the assets of KMA Hong Kong Ltd. The end result was a private Chinese company still carrying the legacy name of KMA Hong Kong Ltd, selling rpac product.
Why would one want to "whoop and hollar" in celebration of Reid attempting to deceive his stockholders? With a customer list of a private Chinese company, pretending it's KMAG customers? Real high "moral integrity"?
There's a little KMAGining to do. The question being: How many customers of the private Chinese company buy rpac EAS tags, involving Reid patents? Note, not all rpac products involve Reid patents. Example: If $3-5M, rpac kicks back a $60K royalty payment. Ref page 7 of the 2012 Annual. The royalty payments are passed through KMAG to Reid as the holder of the patents. KMA Global effectively gets nothing. No accrued value for shareholders is a lot to "whoop and hollar" about isn't it?
All this "whooping and hollaring" is over nothing.
The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM