InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 21466
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2011

Re: jaimerodriques post# 208426

Sunday, 10/05/2014 2:28:37 PM

Sunday, October 05, 2014 2:28:37 PM

Post# of 232507
Gotta get ready to go whoop & hollar

For what?

If you or anyone else will go to the same trouble that I just went to, you will discover that there are about 56 customers/clients per the first 10 pages of his client list



Except, it's a client list for KMA Hong Kong LTD, which is now a private Chinese company.

Neither should it have been any trouble to read the OTC

2012 Annual

Page 6, it clearly states 21-Feb-2011, the subsidiary KMA Hong Kong Ltd was spun off as a separate company. This occurred after rpac bought the assets of KMA Hong Kong Ltd. The end result was a private Chinese company still carrying the legacy name of KMA Hong Kong Ltd, selling rpac product.

Why would one want to "whoop and hollar" in celebration of Reid attempting to deceive his stockholders? With a customer list of a private Chinese company, pretending it's KMAG customers? Real high "moral integrity"?

can one just begin to conceive how much gross income to KMA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS THAT MUST REPRESENT, ON AN ANNUAL BASIS



There's a little KMAGining to do. The question being: How many customers of the private Chinese company buy rpac EAS tags, involving Reid patents? Note, not all rpac products involve Reid patents. Example: If $3-5M, rpac kicks back a $60K royalty payment. Ref page 7 of the 2012 Annual. The royalty payments are passed through KMAG to Reid as the holder of the patents. KMA Global effectively gets nothing. No accrued value for shareholders is a lot to "whoop and hollar" about isn't it?

All this "whooping and hollaring" is over nothing.



The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines