Dad, when I said check the SEC filings for accurate information instead of relying on what is posted which could be false or misleading, that was for everyone, I was not singling you out.
However you have on occasion posted false information that you would not have done had you checked the SEC filings. One example was your posted claim that Freestone was using Petrozene on it's own wells for sales, and the Q proved that to be false, as their wells were not in operation during those Petrozene sales.
But I'm not singling you out for sloppy or no existent Due Diligence, it is rampant among the negative posters. I realize as you previously posted that this is your first OTC stock, so you are going through a learning curve and hopefully will do your own Due Diligence instead of relying on others which may or may not be true or fully accurate.
You asked, quote: "The last noted petrozene sale was $33.
So that probably wouldn't need more machines?"
As I stated in my last post, IMO, that $33 worth of Petrozene is not enough to do any job, and very likely and logical that it was bought to be tested by a major company with a lab facility, to solve several problems with the storage and transportation of crude; problems that if solved will increase their profits on the bottom line. Ask yourself why is the CEO seeking financing for more machines than can currently be produced? Maybe to produce in large quantities satisfy a 'major' customer?
