Hemp Inc (HEMP)

[PalAl]

Kudos on the article find. I posted it a few days ago. While the article states that the deal is to be a 3-year commitment, an article does not a 'binding contract' make.

The article makes it look like REVI is in breach of contract. But, it would make no sense why they would do that to themselves...

I can only imagine there is a clause in the ACTUAL SIGNED DOCUMENT THAT NOBODY HAS A RECORD OF ANYWHERE that provides for early termination of the contract.

If that's the case, the separation of HEMP and REVI is really a non-starter for a catalyst.