Followers | 94 |
Posts | 14406 |
Boards Moderated | 1 |
Alias Born | 12/12/2009 |
Friday, September 26, 2014 9:00:59 AM
Oh and NOW since the testing has gone south (as it's been CLAIMED) the em..."patent" holders on the unit or parts of the unit are just GIDDY that it didn't work---in fact (as it's been CLAIMED) they REFUSED to help make it work in the DOD tests,and also (as it's been CLAIMED) set around laughing about the unit not working or very poor performance.
If there are patent holders isn't that like SHOOTING yourself in the foot??? Sounds to me like they're setting on WORTHLESS PATENTS that they paid THOUSANDS of $$$ to get registered.
Excuse me if I don't find ALL of this pretty fishy and so will others.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM