MediaTechnics Corp (MEDT)

[SEF]

You are the one making it up as you go. I never said they were litigating against preferred share holders I said you argued in post #33418 that the OS was not increased because MEDT was in litigation. Why would an uninvolved debt holder voluntarily stop converting to commons because of litigation against someone else? They wouldn't, yet the OS didn't increase for a year which would have to happen should the preferred convert. The only way your argument held water was if the judge halted the conversions. In fact when you posted #33418 I replied asking why a judge would infringe the rights of unrelated parties and I believe I asked for proof then.