InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 5520
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2009

Re: all that jazz post# 32312

Saturday, 09/20/2014 7:59:11 AM

Saturday, September 20, 2014 7:59:11 AM

Post# of 81111
My comments are in (parens)

BANKRUPTCY might be the very best alternative!!! (Pure nonsense)

Now / "contempt" of court!
AROUND THE CORNER - will MW and RW ever file the IFUS financials as mandated by the courts. (There's more to this and the shareholders know the real deal)

MUCH MORE IMPORTANT - why does MW and RW hide these financials from ALL SHAREHOLDERS??? - if, in fact - shareholders are the owner of OUR Company. The SIMPLE ANSWER - MW and RW are KING and QUEEN of IFUS AND are HIDING - and answer to NO-ONE (except themselves) (wrong again. If shareholders lose faith in MW and RW the company folds, end of story. What's not realized is that the shareholders stand behind MW and RW. They stood by them when they fired JS and SA and I don't see where posting lies in a blog is going to change that lol)

Just wait - for 2012, 2013 and 2014 financials of IFUS to be filed with the courts as mandated by the court - IT WILL BE "PUBLIC" - (actually it won't, better double check the order the judge handed down) provided MW and RW ever file these financials as mandated by the court. Why did MW file another EXTENSION (I think it's been posted in here over and over that it's JS and SA that have filed the extensions. If there's another extension I'm not aware of it, but I've been traveling lately, haven't had time to speak with the shareholder's firm in 10 days) of time (to delay, delay and delay) to file the 2012, 2013 and 2014 financials of IFUS as mandated by the court in the boot brothers lawsuit AGAINST OUR Company?

Remember, MW and RW has filed for a "GAG" order, so as shareholders NEVER see the IFUS financials - as we shareholders know why!!! HOW long can MW and RW lie and deceive ALL SHAREHOLDERS - as we have "rights" also and reviewing our financials is just "one"!!!

MW lies and said, SA is trying to steal OUR Company's 3 shells!!!
IMAGINED THAT / but WHY? (Please post a copy of this. I've spoken to the shareholder's firm about this and they've gone over ALL the filings. No gag order exists, not even a motion to gag! So please tell us AND show us some sort of fact to this)

The IFUS shell is WORTHLESS as:

1. the financials are NOT current with SEC - and can NOT be audited (within reason) as MW and RW spent OVER $40,000 of corporate funds with a CPA firm and the CPA would not issue financials - GUESS WHY? (Again no fact to this at all. Please post proof of this)
2 The company's liabilities far EXCEED the ASSETS (pure nonsense)
3. Most likely, Bankruptcy of IFUS is required to clean up the CONTINGENT debts and claims incurred by MW and RW (and as MW went bankrupt in 2013 - all shareholders know MW likes running away from obligations and creditors) (as I've posted before, if the boot brothers organize the debtors, two things will happen. 1. No law firm would accept the case because 2) the risk to their clients. If it ever did make it to the courtroom it would be thrown out, first hearing, first 5 minutes! THEN that lawyer would become a defense lawyer as costs to liabilities against the plaintiffs would be astronomical. As for the debt, the numbers stated in here are a lie and the shareholders know this is nothing more than a scare tactic....it ain't working)

The OTHER 2 shells are private company's and are not shells as defined - but MW NEVER filed officers, directors and affiliate SEC forms and NEVER told the shareholders of the $250,000 GUARANTEE of IFUS that put the WHOLE Company at RISK and JEOPARDY which clearly violates SEC Rules and Regulations. (Quite frankly he doesn't have to. As a former CEO I went out and obtained short term debt through our subsidiary and neither consulted or informed the shareholders. There's no violation of SEC rules here either, pure misinformation. The law says all he HAS to do is make sure the numbers are properly accounted for, typically for tax purposes. The ONLY exception to this is if the "loan" is bogus and is considered a "wrap" intended to dilute the share structure. Several cases in pinky land come to mind, but one of the most current is EESO and Jarred Hochstedler where him and his band if crooks are now barred from trading or holding any senior level position in a publicly traded company)

AFTER the many attempted court delays by MW and RW in the boot brothers lawsuit AGAINST OUR Company - the financials of IFUS for 2012, 2013 and 2014 will eventually be filed with the court - and when ALL shareholders review these IFUS financials, BANKRUPTCY might be the very best alternative!!! (Again re read the court order and tell us the rest of the story. The shareholders firm did and know EXACTLY what the order reads)