Friday, September 19, 2014 1:46:21 PM
The PR specifically said "commitments" by long time shareholders. The PR did not provide specifics of any sort beyond that.
The Corporate issues that the Company is and / or will be undertaking are very expensive. In the hundreds of thousands of dollars I expect and this does not include actual Mining activity expenses. I don t believe asking for actual and specific Financial information is out of line or negative. A "commitment" by itself means little and for that matter we, as Shareholders, don t even know what the commitment (amount / timing / scope / return etc) is all about. Yes, I expect that in time this information will be provided which is fine from a Business prospective but by not supplying this info (earlier rather than later) may be the very reason that the volume / PPS are not meeting some expectations.
It is fine to provide all the information that they have however the Market, IMO, wants to know that they have the Financial ability to meet the obligations they are taking on. Maybe some investors who are fully vested in Sarissa are comfortable however the not as informed investor is looking for a bit more certainty considering the Company s track record.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM