InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/09/2014

Re: Art Vandeley post# 174554

Friday, 09/19/2014 9:44:03 AM

Friday, September 19, 2014 9:44:03 AM

Post# of 238032
The is No Doubt that is an Activist Move, loudly and deliberately marching into a potential regulatory issue. That is why the Stanley's are (for now) only selling to people on their list and I ~think~ that if they get their "test case" they would prefer it to be in a medical MJ state. My point is that they can win and generate a lot of brand recognition in the process.

As to your .3% question, I don't have tons of time this morning but I did find one supporting cite:

The farm bill also established a statutory definition of
“industrial hemp” as “the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.” The provision was included as part of the research title of the law.



From the second to last paragraph on the second page on this link. I didn't read the entire document for full context but will, it is interesting.