InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 427
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/22/2009

Re: wamuvoodoo post# 404876

Wednesday, 09/17/2014 6:02:51 PM

Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:02:51 PM

Post# of 734361
wamu, i remember that day also, i listened in to quite a few of these hearings, i learned a lot and there's a lot i'm just not educated enough to understand. I did like what i read from the poster's that were in the court room that day. i just don't understand the examiners roll in this, the only thing i can think of is he didn't have to report what FDIC was holding in assets, that's kind of what a few others are saying on here, that's why the assets are not showing up on the books. or he was paid off? I know he wanted to be released from any liability, why is that? is that standard language in a bankruptcy? i really thought we were going to be made whole when Sussman got involved with the examiner. but why the secrecy? There's know one other than employee"s claims left here to care that the FDIC was holding a ton of assets, so pay them there few million and let's move on already. I'm still hoping for the best, just don't understand the secrecy if its legal for them to hold assets back! still hoping for the best but confused as heII. GLTA carguy64
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News