I contacted them via facebook. This was the answer:
Hello xxx,
We are sorry we did not get your questions sooner. Thank you for diligence in reaching out to us. We have used most of 2014 on researching and laying the foundation for the company moving forward. Part of that time was used to formalize the merger between Tulip Enterprises, inc. and Abby, Inc.
In regards to the stock structure we will do what is best for the company and the shareholders long term. Our goal is to work our company plan for long term growth and shareholder value.
In regards to news we want to put out news worthy of a release.
Thank you for suggesting we look at MCPI we will take a look at what they have done and if it is something we feel will help the company and the shareholders long term we will work to see if we can integrate this into our business plans.
Regards,
Abby, Inc.
---------------------------
4. September
04.09.2014 02:12
xxx
Thanks for your answer. Unfortunately you did not answer my questions. It should be possible to answer the question about a reverse split with yes or no. Every company does it, it´s not insider informations, it was a simple question.
I don´t feel good about my investment if i have to be scared the company i trusted my money could steal my shares with a reverse split. Is it an option for you yes or no? A reverse split has nothing to do with shareholder value and there is no reason to do it.
Cancel the 200m shares and then ABBY has a chance, i have never seen a stock with a ceo who owns 245m shares. This shows your investors, that you don´t believe in your company. If you would expect a high pps you would never issue 245m shares for the ceo. In most stocks ceos don´t have more than 3-10m shares.
It was not smart to do it in a moment pps is low, then the upside potential is limited.
You talk about long term long term shareholder value and in the same moment you run penny stock newsletter wallstreetmonster.com or last year stockmister promo with huge dumping of shares, hm...
Regards,
xxx
