e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[heybrad]

as most know but some don't it doesn't matter. As I stated it's not the patent that needs to be litigated as is falsely being implied it's the claims of the patent. Think about it. only certain claims of a patent are usually litigated. Look at 108 there is only one claim being litigated against many. That one claim if ruled on negativley can be estopped in future cases but it doens't mean the rest of 108 can be estopped. So your comment based on the patent legal system makes no sense if one claim satisfies and is enough to make the entire patent litigated.

Again please to others keep in mind it's not the patent that needs to be litigated only issues and claims within the patent. It[s is wrong to say patent 108 wasn't litigated so it's claims can't be estopped. The sole memory issue of 108 can be estopped and has been as we have seen becasue the sole memory issue in a related patent has been litigated and ruled.

It's also false the attempt to claim 108 isn't related to 774. There are different levels of relation and it appears one is being selectivly used to give false information.