InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 774
Posts 39162
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/04/2009

Re: janice shell post# 28503

Tuesday, 09/02/2014 7:36:17 PM

Tuesday, September 02, 2014 7:36:17 PM

Post# of 39473
GUILTY BEYOND ALL DOUBT, CORROBORATING WITH THE ENEMY, ING.
How can you even want to defend the fact they still don't feel
they need to Prove their words true or false?
Any other circumstance you would be screaming for Proof. LOL
WORD is NOT PROOF! Scientific Fact is Proof.
We $PFNO only want a DNA of their bond.
Why wouldn't ING comply with the Top US Forensics Scientist?
ING is in deep shit here, imo.
Sidney Fowlds Walks On Water and Above The Law!




FI$HING FOR THE NEXT TROPHY
$UPERMAN OPINIONS MAY CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE