Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[retiredptt]

IMO all of us in our heart of hearts know JBI/PTOI is hiding processor performance and hiding from 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 claims made.

Bare with me as I've created an example that switches from pyrolysis to the automobile business but its relevant. Lets say I, for example, invented an electric car that was to do things never seen before in the automobile industry. Lets say I teased the car's capabilities for years while in R&D.

Coming out of R&D what would my investors expect of me?

When out of R&D and claiming to be in car sales would they not want to see the car in action and put in regular scenarios that prove my claims made?

If it was my idea you'd see me and my team of drivers driving from Niagara to San Francisco and back with camera crews and bloggers blogging mile by mile while on the journey to prove out I developed what I claimed I had all along. I'd go out of my way to have news crews watching me as I pulled into charging stations and everyone would have access to my record keeping. Everyone would know what went into that car and what came out as I traveled from charge to charge. The shareholders I counted on to fund the company would be true partners. I'd even give them a website to log into if they ever wanted to watch the car on its journey in real-time. They'd have their own cockpit cam, if you will. Dashboard data would be available in real-time too because I'd have nothing to hide and everything to gain getting my story out. The car would virtually never stop driving and the buzz created would sell cars which would be the goal, right??? I mean.. as the brainchild behind the idea why would I not pound my chest and prove to the world I had what I claimed I had?

With this said, the question we have to ask ourselves is why is Bordynuik doing the exact opposite??? A change in business plan to sell fuel vs. sell processors doesn't change the reality that shareholders 14+ months after Processor 3's June 2013 release really have no idea what they invested in. I know I don't!

Going back to my car example what if I chose to not do what I described and to instead take the Bordynuik approach of providing shareholders the most basic information only? What if after 14 months all my shareholders knew was that I drove the car from Niagara to Syracuse and back a handful of times? What if all I documented was miles driven? Would my shareholders rally behind me? Should they? But.. but.. but.. what if I started the car in my Niagara parking lot and even invited shareholders to sit in it and drive it around the parking lot??? Would that help?

Probably not because I would have proven very little other than I had a car that drives. The exercise would do very little to prove out I had a product that delivered on all of my grandiose claims made.

We're 14+ months into Processor 3 and lets face it, nothing makes sense and John Bordynuik and JBI/PTOI's behavior has given us very little to sink our teeth into and its a concern; it has to be!