Monday, September 01, 2014 5:13:54 PM
I understand. But you suggested it only occured when he issued himself the Preferred "E" shares and that gave him voting rights FOREVER. If the Preferred "A" shares are legit, and you suggest they are, he already held voting rights.
Plus the Preferred "A" Designation you suggest is legit, prohibits the Preferred "E" shares from being issued, right? Isn't that what the 8K you linked said?
So how could there be another hijacking? And wouldn't the prohibition of the Preffered "E" shares be a fourth reason?
Thanks in advance for the clarification.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM