InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 901
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2006

Re: Pyrrhonian post# 18140

Monday, 09/01/2014 3:13:05 PM

Monday, September 01, 2014 3:13:05 PM

Post# of 690192
Pyrr, can't fault your logic on the potential for limited low-CD4/WBC patients in the PhIII. On the other hand, NW saw fit to want to create a subgroup, so they see the possibility of an issue (and eliminated it as a possible reason for non-approval).

My theory is that the exclusion criteria of no progression post-SoC has created slower event rates in both cohorts; if the low CD4 issue is not seen much, this would add to the slower event thesis. And the slower event rates are what led the BSSR to generate N going from 240 to 348, while PFS advantage goes from 6 to 4.

Related to the low CD4/WBC issue, this is why Dr. Liau's PhII trial of DCVax-L with immune system adjuvants could be very important. If the adjuvant cohorts (the PhII has 3 cohorts: 2 adjuvants and 1 control) show better outcomes, these could be used to counteract low CD4/WBC issues.

Further, if the PhII shows positive adjuvant outcomes, then if DCVax-L gets approved, I would expect an adjuvant to be added to the DCVax-L protocol. As well, it would then allow the SoC to stay the same, with chemo, using the adjuvant to counteract the chemo effects.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News